Anupam Mittal and Shark Tank Judges Expose 'Quack Doctor' on the Show
In a recent episode of Shark Tank India, a wellness brand pitched by influencer Dr. Manoj Das faced intense scrutiny from the judges, particularly Anupam Mittal, over his qualifications and claims. The episode, titled 'Sweet Ideas and Bold Dreams', aired on January 5, 2026, and showcased the brand's natural skincare and haircare products.
The judges, including Aman Gupta, Anupam Mittal, Namita Thapar, and Kunal Bahl, were quick to point out the influencer's questionable credentials. Dr. Das claimed to be a naturopath and aromatherapy specialist, using the title 'Doctor' before his name, which baffled Anupam. He questioned the credibility of the title, especially since the influencer was not a medical doctor.
Mittal's frustration was evident as he challenged Dr. Das's intentions, suggesting that he was exploiting people's vulnerabilities, including hair loss, weight loss, and aging. The influencer's response was defensive, and he provided some ratings and reviews from his Amazon marketplace, which showed a 3.5 rating. However, this led to further accusations from the judges, who suspected these reviews might be paid.
The situation took a turn when Kunal Bahl asked for the specific ratings and reviews on the influencer's website and other marketplaces. Dr. Das revealed that his brand, Lewisia Wellness, had gained 4 crores in profits, which surprised the judges even more. Aman Gupta exclaimed, 'Kuch gadbad hai, sir,' while Anupam Mittal asked, 'Tum kya kaand karne aaye ho?'
The backlash continued online after the episode's release. Dr. Rahul Chawla, a neurologist, called Dr. Das a 'quack doctor' and challenged viewers to verify the degrees of influencers and doctors they follow on social media. The article emphasizes that it is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.
The episode sparked a debate on the authenticity of health influencers and the importance of verifying credentials. It also highlighted the potential risks of making health claims without proper qualifications, leaving viewers with a thought-provoking question: How can we ensure the integrity of health advice in the digital age?